I've spent a couple of days giving out financial assistance for storm and flood affected people in Warrawong, which is a depressed area of Wollongong, an hour or so south of where I live.
A storm came through about 9 days ago and the Wollongong area was hard hit.
The people coming for assistance were different to other groups I've seen. The majority of people seeking help live in old public housing which has not been maintained. Their faces show the marks of not just a bad weather event but lifetimes of hardship. Some of them have very obviously given up.
There was flooding which came from the huge volumes of water rising into homes but there was also a great deal of storm damage where roofs leaked, guttering overflowed into the roof or water made it's way through a poorly sealed window or wall.
At least two women told me that they had recently been homeless and were looking forward to being settled in a home they could invite children or grandchildren to. Now those hopes have to be put on hold while they wait for the housing authority to put in new flooring or repairs and for the women themselves to replace furniture, clothes and bedding.
One man who had lost his wallet sat down and while we tried to figure out a way to confirm his ID. I commented on the scar on his head. I meant the large scar on the back of his head (it came from somebody hitting him with a post) but he thought I meant the one along his hairline. Somebody drove over his head like it was a speed hump and his face had to be peeled back so his eye sockets could be reconstructed. The guy left home at 17 when his stepfather tried to kill him.
I think I have some understanding of poverty and disadvantage until I meet people like this. It's hard to see so many people who are injured, traumatised, toothless and strung out.
The system assesses people based on their level of loss but in this kind of community, they don't have much to lose so they don't qualify for a lot of help. I'm not sure how to design the system better. I don't think the answer is in changing the disaster grants, I think it's in looking after people better over the long term.
Most people receive a grant that is enough money to assist with a replacement fridge or a cheap mattress. My partner told me a total loss qualifies for a larger payment so when a homeless man came in and said all his possessions were stored under a house and got washed away I thought he qualified for the larger amount. I hesitated to approve the amount, knowing he'll probably do something self destructive with the money but I also thought it's not up to me to determine the outcome. I later found out the larger grant is not for "total loss" but for people whose home is condemned. The devil is in the detail, right?
I'll feel pretty silly about that for a long time.
If it hasn't hit your favourite news outlet, Molly the Magpie is going to be returned to his home. I think there are some hoops for his guardians to jump through first but he will get there.